Tweet
divdiv class=story-body readability=54 span class=story-date#13; span class=date29 October 2013/span#13; span class=time-textLast updated at /spanspan class=time20:01 ET/span#13; #13; /span#13; #13; #13; #13; #13; #13; #13; #13; p class=introduction id=story_continues_1Management fees charged by pension providers could be capped between 0.75% and 1%, according to proposals being set out by the government./p#13; pThe Treasury is consulting on its plans to cap fees, which it says could save people tens of thousands of pounds./p#13; pSome older schemes set up more than a decade ago have been found to charge up to 2.3% a year in management fees./p#13; pOn Tuesday pensions minister Steve Webb said the government would launch a full frontal assault on pension fees./p#13; span class=cross-headAuto-enrolment/span#13; pThe consultation will seek industry input on three possible options: a 1% cap, a 0.75% cap, or a two-tier comply or explain cap, where pension providers will be capped at 0.75%, rising to 1% if they can explain to regulators why their scheme must charge more. /p#13; pA Treasury spokesperson said any final cap could lie somewhere between the two levels suggested, depending on the evidence received./p#13; div class=story-feature narrow#13; a class=hidden href=#story_continues_2Continue reading the main story/a h2 class=quote“spanStart Quote/span/h2#13; blockquote readability=1p class=first-childIt is important that any cap doesn't have the effect of levelling charges up”/p/blockquote#13; span class=endquoteEnd Quote/span#13; span class=quote-creditOtto Thoresen/span#13; span class=quote-credit-titleAssociation of British Insurers director general/span#13; #13; /div p id=story_continues_2The proposed cap would also only apply to auto-enrolment funds./p#13; pSince last October, workers have been gradually signed up to workplace pensions, such as the government funded National Employment Savings Trust (Nest) scheme, unless they deliberately opt out./p#13; pOver the next five years, nine million extra people are expected to join so-called defined contribution schemes./p#13; pThe average charge on a pension set up in 2012 was 0.51%, but the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimates that there are more than 186,000 pension pots with £2.65bn worth of assets subject to annual charges of more than 1%./p#13; pOlder pension schemes, set up more than a decade ago, were found to be charging as much as 2.3% in annual fees./p#13; pThe government said that someone who saved £100 a month over a 46-year working life could lose almost £170,000 from their pension pot with a 1% charge and more than £230,000 with a 1.5% charge./p#13; pAnd a saver with a 0.75% annual charge on their pension pot could end up £100,000 better off than if they had been charged a rate of 1.5%, it added. /p#13; span class=cross-head'Detail crucial'/span#13; pMr Webb outlined the plans for a cap on fees in amendments to the government's pensions bill on Tuesday, which is currently working its way through parliament./p#13; div class=story-feature narrow#13; a class=hidden href=#story_continues_3Continue reading the main story/a h2 class=quote“spanStart Quote/span/h2#13; blockquote readability=1p class=first-childWe also need to see tight regulation so these charges can't simply be hidden elsewhere”/p/blockquote#13; span class=endquoteEnd Quote/span#13; span class=quote-creditRichard Lloyd/span#13; span class=quote-credit-titleWhich? executive director/span#13; #13; /div p id=story_continues_3The industry has reacted cautiously to plans for a cap, however./p#13; pResponding to the launch of the consultation, Otto Thoresen, director general of the Association of British Insurers (ABI), said pension charges were at their lowest ever average levels. /p#13; pThe industry was committed to making pension reform a success, he said, but warned: It is important that any cap doesn't have the effect of levelling charges up./p#13; pThe detail around what is included in the charge definition will be crucial, as is the need to recognise that other factors contribute to customers receiving value for money./p#13; pLast month the OFT published a report criticising pension schemes containing £40bn worth of savings that were delivering poor value for money, but it stopped short of recommending a fees cap./p#13; pIt advised the government to make pensions more transparent and easier to compare, and to give greater powers to regulators./p#13; pConsumer group Which? said it welcomed the plan for a cap but urged ministers to see if it could be set even lower than 0.75%./p#13; pExecutive director Richard Lloyd said: Even a fraction of a per cent can have a significant impact on pension funds, and people need to be confident that their scheme is giving them the best value for money./p#13; pWe also need to see tight regulation so these charges can't simply be hidden elsewhere, and the government should look at what can be done to bring down charges on existing schemes set up before 2001./p#13; /div/divbrbrcentera href=http://www.wizardrss.comPowered By WizardRSS.com/a | a href=http://www.wizardrss.comFull Text RSS Feed/a | a href=http://www.amazon.com/RFID-Blocking-Cards-Identity-Protector/dp/B00CJHZLEWRFID/a | a href=http://www.wpzonbuilder.comAmazon Affiliate/a/center