Tweet
divdiv class=story-body readability=46 span class=story-date#13; span class=date2 November 2013/span#13;span class=time-textLast updated at /spanspan class=time22:28 ET/span#13; #13;/span#13;#13; #13;#13;#13; #13; #13; #13; #13; p class=introduction id=story_continues_1Officers accused of giving misleading accounts of a meeting with former chief whip Andrew Mitchell are facing an investigation by the police watchdog./p#13; pThey will also be called back before an influential committee of MPs over evidence they gave to them previously./p#13; pThe Independent Police Complaints Commission said there were procedural irregularities in an earlier probe./p#13; pThe three Police Federation reps had been told they would face no action over the so-called Plebgate affair./p#13; pIn September 2012, Mr Mitchell was accused of calling Downing Street officers plebs after they refused to let him ride his bicycle through the main gates./p#13; pThe then cabinet member apologised for using bad language but denied using the word pleb. He later resigned as chief whip as the row continued./p#13; pA month later, Mr Mitchell held a meeting with Det Sgt Stuart Hinton, Insp Ken MacKaill and Sgt Chris Jones from the federation in an attempt to smooth things over./p#13; pAfter the meeting in the West Midlands, the officers, who represent Warwickshire, West Mercia and West Midlands forces respectively, briefed the media./p#13; div class=story-feature narrow#13; a class=hidden href=#story_continues_2Continue reading the main story/a h2 class=quote“spanStart Quote/span/h2#13;blockquote readability=1p class=first-childEvidence given to the Home Affairs Select Committee on October 23 revealed a number of procedural irregularities between the production of the draft and final West Mercia reports”/p/blockquote#13;span class=endquoteEnd Quote/span#13; span class=quote-creditDeborah Glass/span#13; span class=quote-credit-titleIPCC deputy chairwoman/span#13;#13; /div p id=story_continues_2A transcript of a recording Mr Mitchell made of the meeting contradicted the officers' account of what was said./p#13; pCh Insp Jerry Reakes-Williams, head of professional standards at Warwickshire and West Mercia Police, carried out an investigation and concluded they had a case to answer for misconduct, but their senior officers disagreed./p#13; pNow the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has announced it will conduct its own investigation into the officers' behaviour./p#13; pDet Sgt Hinton and Sgt Jones have additionally been called to reappear before the Home Affairs Select Committee after being accused of giving misleading answers to MPs last month. The committee wants them to apologise for misleading it./p#13; span class=cross-head'Mistakenly believed'/span#13; pIPCC deputy chairwoman Deborah Glass said: Evidence given to the Home Affairs Select Committee on October 23 revealed a number of procedural irregularities between the production of the draft and final West Mercia reports./p#13; #13; pOn August 12 2013, a final report was provided to the IPCC. It contained a single set of conclusions to the effect that no case to answer for misconduct was made out against any of the three officers under investigation./p#13; pHowever, it is clear from CI Reakes-Williams's evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee that this conclusion did not reflect his opinion. His opinion was (and remains) that a case to answer for misconduct was made out./p#13; pHowever, he mistakenly believed that his report should reflect the view of the 'appropriate authorities' - the senior officers in each of the forces involved./p#13; pThe 'appropriate authorities' are the final decision-making bodies, and they are entitled to reach a different decision to the conclusions of the investigator./p#13; pHowever, this is an entirely separate process. The procedure described above has conflated the two./p#13; span class=cross-headPublic confidence/span#13; pMs Glass said she did not have the power to reopen the investigation when she gave evidence to MPs on the same day as the officers./p#13; pBut she has now said the investigation was incomplete because the final report did not include Ch Insp Reakes-Williams' opinion./p#13; pShe said the IPCC was launching its own inquiry because public confidence in the police was at stake./p#13; pHome affairs committee chairman Keith Vaz said: We were appalled by the evidence given by DS Hinton, Sgt Jones and Inspector MacKaill. We have recalled them to correct the record and if they do not, they will be in prima facie contempt of Parliament./p#13; pThe narrative of what we have seen could rival any great work of fiction. /p#13; pAt every point and at every level, instead of being transparent, we have uncovered a process that obstructs the truth. If this can happen to a cabinet minister, what hope is there for anyone else?/p#13; pShadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: The select committee has done an important job in laying bare the failure of the process to deal with the Sutton Coldfield meeting between Andrew Mitchell and police officers last October. This case should now be independently re-determined./p#13; pWest Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner Bob Jones said he welcomed the IPCC's decision to independently consider the investigation./p#13; /div/divbrbrcentera href=http://www.wizardrss.comPowered By WizardRSS.com/a | a href=http://www.wizardrss.comFull Text RSS Feed/a | a href=http://www.amazon.com/RFID-Blocking-Cards-Identity-Protector/dp/B00CJHZLEWRFID/a | a href=http://www.wpzonbuilder.comAmazon Affiliate/a/center