Islamic Terrorism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bijufox
    • Oct 2006
    • 71

    Islamic Terrorism

    We live in a world of curious euphemisms. There are things we want to say at times but cannot. So we say them in different ways.

    For instance, whenever we Indians say Pakistan, what we really mean is Muslim. When we say Pakistan is behind something, what we actually mean is: These Muslims are behind it. But since it?s still politically incorrect to blame an entire community, and a minority one at that, we blame it on Pakistan. Pakistan , to the average Indian, incorrectly I dare say, represents all that is wrong with Islam. Every time we blame Pakistan, we are actually blaming Muslims.

    For we Indians, or at least a very large section among us, are veering around to the belief that a secular India is not a place for Muslims- for Muslims owe allegiance, FIRST and FOREMOST to ISLAM, not to any NATION. While this may not be entirely true, as I know many Muslims who swear by India and secularism just as I know many Arabs who swear by Palestine, not Islam, the truth is also that, worldwide, Muslims appear to be firming up in their belief that their faith is more important than their nationality. That Allah is more important than India or UK or Saudi Arabia. We read about this daily. We watch it on TV.

    What we call terrorism today is actually any bloody and ghastly crime that cannot be explained. A terrorist is a person who kills others, in a flamboyant, random manner, for reasons that cannot be explained away by emotions like greed, lust, anger. The terrorist does not kill to inherit property-he inherits the Kingdom of God.

    The terrorist does not kill for love or lust-he loves and fears only God and lusts after the vestal virgins waiting for him in heaven. The terrorist, in fact, does not even kill someone he or she hates-the target is always unknown and innocent people, many of them sharing a common faith with the perpetrators of the crime. So why does a terrorist kill?

    No one knows. Often not even the terrorist himself. That is why many terrorists psyche or drug themselves out before committing the crime.
    Yes, it?s time for anger. True. That?s what I keep saying . But it?s equally important that we do not allow this anger to blunt our intelligence or cloud our judgment. Neither should we allow politicians to endanger our lives any further by allowing showmanship to replace hard-nosed law enforcement. We need to beat back terrorism, not allow our leaders to use this opportunity to score brownie points off each other . Tilting at windmills wins no wars.

    What could win the war for us is a concerted, all out effort to fight terrorism which hurts all of us in the end. Including innocent Muslims who get blown up in bomb blasts, just like anyone else. All, alas, in the name of Allah.
  • podachekka
    • Nov 2006
    • 83

    #2
    vitu kala bijuve manushiyan cheythitu daivathinu appu vekkunu ne ollu

    Comment

    • bikkubikku
      • Oct 2006
      • 147

      #3
      Old Terrorism is a term used to describe violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians by groups or persons for political, nationalist, or religious goals. As a type of unconventional warfare, terrorism means to weaken or supplant existing political landscapes through capitulation, acquiescence, or radicalization, as opposed to subversion or direct military action.

      Modern terrorism is increasingly motivated by extremist religious ideologies. The most worrisome example is the worldwide Jihad phenomenon.The religious motif as the central motivating factor has occupied experts all over the world in an attempt to find a way of dealing with this threat.

      Experts point to two main trends in modern terrorism. The first is the tendency toward higher-casualty attacks, and the second is a far-reaching change in the motivation behind terrorist attacks. Today?s terrorist is much more likely to be driven by extremist religious beliefs than by a wish to gain political concessions; the Islamist extremist al-Qaida network is a prime example of this. The aim of such groups is to win converts among potential supporters, to intimidate potential enemies, and to punish actual enemies.

      "Islam is not the source of terrorism, but its solution", says one famouse author Harun Yahya.

      "By God, he is not a true believer,
      from whose mischief his neighbors do not feel secure."
      Prophet Mohammed (Bukhari, Muslim)

      "Hurt no one so that no one may hurt you. Remember that you will indeed meet your Lord, and that He will indeed reckon your deeds."
      From the last sermon of Prophet Mohammed

      Murdering innocent people in the name of religion is unacceptable
      "Islam is not the source of terrorism, but its solution", says author Harun Yahya.

      "Who has the greatest duty to stop violence committed by Muslims against innocent non-Muslims in the name of Islam? The answer, obviously, is Muslims."
      Ingrid Mattson, Vice President, Islamic Society of North America

      All this shows if Muslims can come forward to stop this terror and leaders of peace the word Islamic terrorism can be removed from our debates.

      Comment

      • sant2910
        • Nov 2006
        • 21

        #4
        Terrorism refers here to the public health consequences and the methods for prevention of the purposeful use of violence or threats of violence by groups or individuals in order to serve political or personal agendas.

        Comment

        • Samanthajones
          • Sep 2006
          • 5008

          #5
          thxn for the post..keep up the gr8 posting!!!
          ~Samanthajones~

          Comment

          • podachekka
            • Nov 2006
            • 83

            #6
            chachi sundari anaello ente kootu thannanello

            Comment

            • bn_india
              • Oct 2006
              • 55

              #7
              Agruments on both side..

              There are examples and quotes in islam that could be used either for good or bad.. For example: the quote that says that all non-believers are infidels and that it is islams job to find a solution to the "infidel problem".. Everybody knows that this is the used to recruit terrorists.

              There are very small kids that are brain washed with this concept and they would grow up to become suicide bombers!!!?

              Most secular Muslims are left to defend a religion and concept that needs a overhaul and it is about time islam needs to change with time. This religion was formed many years ago and was made at a time when things were different and law of land was different....

              Now this needs adapt for betterment of humans : for Example : Burka, Sheriya Law, religious tolerance, and so on..

              There is no emotion; there is peace. There is no ignorance; there is knowledge. There is no passion; there is serenity. There is no chaos: there is harmony. There is no death; there is the Force.

              Comment

              • aswathy123
                • Oct 2006
                • 3530

                #8
                Terrorism is a term used to describe violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians by groups or persons for political, nationalist, or religious goals. As a type of unconventional warfare, terrorism means to weaken or supplant existing political landscapes through capitulation, acquiescence, or radicalization, as opposed to subversion or direct military action.

                "Terrorist attacks" usually are characterized as "indiscriminate", the "targeting of civilians", or as executed "with disregard for human life". The term "terrorism" often is used to assert that the enemy's political violence is immoral, wanton, and unjustified. Per the most common definition of terrorism — typically used by states, academics, counter-terrorism experts, and civil, non-governmental organizations —, "terrorists" are actors who do not belong to any recognized armed forces or who don't abide the laws of war, and who, therefore, are regarded as "rogue actors".

                Those labelled "terrorists" rarely identify themselves so and, instead, typically use terms referring to their ideological or ethnic struggle, such as: separatist, freedom fighter, liberator, revolutionary, vigilante, militant, paramilitary, guerrilla, rebel, jihadi or mujaheddin, or fedayeen, or any similar-meaning word in other languages.

                Terrorism has been used by a broad array of political organizations in furthering their objectives; both right-wing and left-wing political parties, nationalistic, and religious groups, revolutionaries and ruling governments.[1]

                Some persons and governments believe that the term "Terrorism", as defined in dictionaries, now has a negative connotation, under the theory that a person who attacks the civilian population is, instead, a militant, regardless of the status of the victims of terrorism.

                Tanx biju for starting this thread

                Comment

                • kumaranrar
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 1983

                  #9
                  Ya true for a normal Indian Pakistan = muslims.true words like Pakistan & terrorist are being misused

                  Comment

                  • jay303
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 28

                    #10
                    friends....there is new idea ...a very interesting idea i read by a columnist in a paper in which he says the root of islamic terrorism is simply that the Muslims cant stand each other in a free society and needs a iron hand to lead them always....they fight each other Sunni Vs Shia etc etc .......and some ''enlightened '' who wants to feel the heaven takes others life too...
                    Originally posted by bijufox View Post
                    We live in a world of curious euphemisms. There are things we want to say at times but cannot. So we say them in different ways.

                    For instance, whenever we Indians say Pakistan, what we really mean is Muslim. When we say Pakistan is behind something, what we actually mean is: These Muslims are behind it. But since it?s still politically incorrect to blame an entire community, and a minority one at that, we blame it on Pakistan. Pakistan , to the average Indian, incorrectly I dare say, represents all that is wrong with Islam. Every time we blame Pakistan, we are actually blaming Muslims.

                    For we Indians, or at least a very large section among us, are veering around to the belief that a secular India is not a place for Muslims- for Muslims owe allegiance, FIRST and FOREMOST to ISLAM, not to any NATION. While this may not be entirely true, as I know many Muslims who swear by India and secularism just as I know many Arabs who swear by Palestine, not Islam, the truth is also that, worldwide, Muslims appear to be firming up in their belief that their faith is more important than their nationality. That Allah is more important than India or UK or Saudi Arabia. We read about this daily. We watch it on TV.

                    What we call terrorism today is actually any bloody and ghastly crime that cannot be explained. A terrorist is a person who kills others, in a flamboyant, random manner, for reasons that cannot be explained away by emotions like greed, lust, anger. The terrorist does not kill to inherit property-he inherits the Kingdom of God.

                    The terrorist does not kill for love or lust-he loves and fears only God and lusts after the vestal virgins waiting for him in heaven. The terrorist, in fact, does not even kill someone he or she hates-the target is always unknown and innocent people, many of them sharing a common faith with the perpetrators of the crime. So why does a terrorist kill?

                    No one knows. Often not even the terrorist himself. That is why many terrorists psyche or drug themselves out before committing the crime.
                    Yes, it?s time for anger. True. That?s what I keep saying . But it?s equally important that we do not allow this anger to blunt our intelligence or cloud our judgment. Neither should we allow politicians to endanger our lives any further by allowing showmanship to replace hard-nosed law enforcement. We need to beat back terrorism, not allow our leaders to use this opportunity to score brownie points off each other . Tilting at windmills wins no wars.

                    What could win the war for us is a concerted, all out effort to fight terrorism which hurts all of us in the end. Including innocent Muslims who get blown up in bomb blasts, just like anyone else. All, alas, in the name of Allah.

                    Comment

                    • remya_2k
                      • Jan 2015
                      • 13

                      #11
                      Re: Islamic Terrorism

                      I don't think we should call it islamic... its just terrorism.

                      they don't have a religion.

                      Comment

                      • ~IronMan~
                        Admin
                        • Nov 2006
                        • 21300

                        #12
                        Re: Islamic Terrorism

                        Originally posted by remya_2k View Post
                        I don't think we should call it islamic... its just terrorism.

                        they don't have a religion.
                        True, it should'nt be called Islamic terrorism, but all terrorists are Islmamic, but they make Nabi's name bad
                        DONATE & SUPPORT US




                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X