Tweet
11 January 2011
Last updated at 11:36
A teacher was sacked after bringing a sledge into school and allowing two pupils to ride on it, a disciplinary hearing has heard.
Design teacher Richard Tremelling said he took it to Cefn Hengoed Community School, Swansea, in February 2009 as an example of "classic design".
He was dismissed for failing to follow the school's health and safety policy.
The General Teaching Council (GTC) committee found him guilty of unacceptable professional conduct.
The professional conduct committee found four charges proven, including allowing the pupils to go sledging and ignoring cautionary words of warning from colleagues.
The hearing heard that two boys on Mr Tremelling's GCSE design and technology course asked to try out the sledge at the end of the lesson, and he took them sledging on the snow-covered school grounds.
Mr Tremelling was initially suspended pending an inquiry, accused of failing to consult the head teacher, or writing to the school governors, before setting off.
Continue reading the main story “Start Quote
While he maintained he risk-assessed the activity before it began, he was told he should have done it in writing.
Mr Tremelling is accused of nine separate breaches, amounting to an alleged failure in his duty of care to pupils.
Appearing before a professional conduct committee on Monday, he argued that the sledging session was a logical extension of a lesson.
Mr Tremelling said his own risk assessment had been sufficient and that a written assessment had been unnecessary.
"I did not go sledding on a cheap Asda £10 sledge," Mr Tremelling told the committee. "I went on a Scandinavian classic design sledge which has built-in safety features, and also a brake."
He agreed that neither of the pupils involved had worn protective masks but said he did not believe they were necessary.
The sledge in question was a Scandinavian "snow racer" which was an "exceedingly stable sledge", Mr Tremelling told the hearing.
"Given that it was not over hard ground but grass, I did not deem that head gear was necessary."
'No significant risk' Because riders sit upright on the sledge he did not think knee or elbow pads were necessary either.
The hearing heard that school policy stated that written permission was needed for any outside activity or visit.
But Mr Tremelling said that did not regard the sledging as either an official activity because it was within school, or a visit out of school.
An independent assessment had later been made of the sledging which concluded "no significant risk" was presented by Mr Tremelling's actions.
Mr Tremelling said the sledge, while appropriate for the weather, was also made of wood, metal and plastic, which was rare in itself and useful for teaching purposes.
The GTC's professional conduct committee hearing in Cardiff found him guilty of four out of nine charges: That he allowed pupils to go sledging, didn't have head teacher's permission, ignored cautionary words of warning from colleagues and denied the allegation when questioned by the head.
It has retired to consider what sanction to bring against him.
He was cleared of five charges, including that there was no risk assement, there was no parental consent and health and safety guidelines were not followed.
Webmaster Forum | SEO Forum | Coding Forum | Graphics Forum</b>
Design teacher Richard Tremelling said he took it to Cefn Hengoed Community School, Swansea, in February 2009 as an example of "classic design".
He was dismissed for failing to follow the school's health and safety policy.
The General Teaching Council (GTC) committee found him guilty of unacceptable professional conduct.
The professional conduct committee found four charges proven, including allowing the pupils to go sledging and ignoring cautionary words of warning from colleagues.
The hearing heard that two boys on Mr Tremelling's GCSE design and technology course asked to try out the sledge at the end of the lesson, and he took them sledging on the snow-covered school grounds.
Mr Tremelling was initially suspended pending an inquiry, accused of failing to consult the head teacher, or writing to the school governors, before setting off.
Continue reading the main story “Start Quote
Given that it was not over hard ground but grass, I did not deem that head gear was necessary”
End Quote
Richard Tremelling
While he maintained he risk-assessed the activity before it began, he was told he should have done it in writing.
Mr Tremelling is accused of nine separate breaches, amounting to an alleged failure in his duty of care to pupils.
Appearing before a professional conduct committee on Monday, he argued that the sledging session was a logical extension of a lesson.
Mr Tremelling said his own risk assessment had been sufficient and that a written assessment had been unnecessary.
"I did not go sledding on a cheap Asda £10 sledge," Mr Tremelling told the committee. "I went on a Scandinavian classic design sledge which has built-in safety features, and also a brake."
He agreed that neither of the pupils involved had worn protective masks but said he did not believe they were necessary.
The sledge in question was a Scandinavian "snow racer" which was an "exceedingly stable sledge", Mr Tremelling told the hearing.
"Given that it was not over hard ground but grass, I did not deem that head gear was necessary."
'No significant risk' Because riders sit upright on the sledge he did not think knee or elbow pads were necessary either.
The hearing heard that school policy stated that written permission was needed for any outside activity or visit.
But Mr Tremelling said that did not regard the sledging as either an official activity because it was within school, or a visit out of school.
An independent assessment had later been made of the sledging which concluded "no significant risk" was presented by Mr Tremelling's actions.
Mr Tremelling said the sledge, while appropriate for the weather, was also made of wood, metal and plastic, which was rare in itself and useful for teaching purposes.
The GTC's professional conduct committee hearing in Cardiff found him guilty of four out of nine charges: That he allowed pupils to go sledging, didn't have head teacher's permission, ignored cautionary words of warning from colleagues and denied the allegation when questioned by the head.
It has retired to consider what sanction to bring against him.
He was cleared of five charges, including that there was no risk assement, there was no parental consent and health and safety guidelines were not followed.
Webmaster Forum | SEO Forum | Coding Forum | Graphics Forum</b>