Tweet
Institute venture misinterpreted: Ghai
Filmmaker Subhash Ghai, whose film institute Whistling Woods has been asked to surrender the land allotted to it, on Friday said that petitioners who had challenged the allotment before the Bombay High Court misinterpreted the nature of his venture. Ghai also said that he would be moving the Supreme Court.
0The High Court, in response to a PIL by Rajendra Sontakke and others, on Thursday ruled that allotment of land to Whistling Woods by the State (when Vilasrao Deshmukh was the Chief Minister) was without “authority of the law”, and amounted to abuse of power.
“I respect the decision of the High Court. I feel they (petitioners) misinterpreted and overlooked the things. Whenever there is a court case, there are two versions. All I know is that we have not done anything wrong. Our vision is to create a platform in Bombay about cinema,” Ghai informed
“What is our fault? Government also wanted this kind of educational institution, it encouraged it and we executed it. We hope for justice in the Supreme Court.”
The High Court held that the joint venture agreement between Mukta Arts and Maharashtra Film, Stage and Cultural Development Corporation (MFSCDC) was “illegal, arbitrary and without authority of law”.
Filmmaker Subhash Ghai, whose film institute Whistling Woods has been asked to surrender the land allotted to it, on Friday said that petitioners who had challenged the allotment before the Bombay High Court misinterpreted the nature of his venture. Ghai also said that he would be moving the Supreme Court.
0The High Court, in response to a PIL by Rajendra Sontakke and others, on Thursday ruled that allotment of land to Whistling Woods by the State (when Vilasrao Deshmukh was the Chief Minister) was without “authority of the law”, and amounted to abuse of power.
“I respect the decision of the High Court. I feel they (petitioners) misinterpreted and overlooked the things. Whenever there is a court case, there are two versions. All I know is that we have not done anything wrong. Our vision is to create a platform in Bombay about cinema,” Ghai informed
“What is our fault? Government also wanted this kind of educational institution, it encouraged it and we executed it. We hope for justice in the Supreme Court.”
The High Court held that the joint venture agreement between Mukta Arts and Maharashtra Film, Stage and Cultural Development Corporation (MFSCDC) was “illegal, arbitrary and without authority of law”.
